To the editor:

There are political undercurrents  to the discussion regarding changes to Langley’s form of government. The community has different and conflicting perspectives on this issue, and dialogue must be open and honest. 
Barbara Seitle, a league member, has stated that “It seemed like as good as time as any to do it (discuss changes in form)” (Record, Feb. 16).

I am troubled and disappointed in the League of Women Voters for such vagueness, when most of the community is aware of a movement by supporters of some city council members to change the form of government and shift the balance of power in the city.

For clear and open dialogue, I urge the league to be specific in its introduction on Wednesday, stating the individuals who had contact with the league (Ms. Seitle) regarding this matter so that the public involvement process maintains integrity.

Based on 40 years of planning with Washington communities, my experience dictates that a mayor elected from the council by the council dilutes a check-and-balance system and disconnects mayoral accountability from the voters for smaller communities. Openness is critical to this dialogue.

Ron Kasprisin
Langley