Editor,

Ah, a good discussion (Patrick Ryan’s March 21 letter), somewhat inaccurate, but civil. I too echo Mr. Ryan’s call for attendance at the April 14 workshop on the marina/downtown connection in the hope that we have an open and creative discourse on options.

In small towns there are two economic engines: the downtown and industry — we have a downtown and marina/resort district instead. Low-density residential use services generally are subsidized by the other two (American Farmland Trust). My mission is to strengthen each (downtown and marina district) through a safe, convenient, consistent and reliable pedestrian assist — whatever it is, from van(s) to elevator — not as an amusement trick but as an economic infrastructure element. And with that “assist,” yes, I want to support existing uses (Boatyard Inn, port/marina, vacation rentals) and the potential Drake/Langley Inn development and future marina expansion to enhance a quality economic benefit for Langley.

The funicular/inclined elevator has been discussed for many years. It’s not a new idea and is only one of a number of options (I worked with the city/borough of Ketchikan on their Creek Street tram, 1984). However, I am hoping to see other constructive options presented and discussed on April 14 so we can let go of the “us versus them” dialogue and use our transportation infrastructure funds effectively.

I still support Paul Schell’s dream of integrating a mechanical lift into new Drake development (original proposal had it on port property which the port opposed) to bolster and strengthen new Wharf Street uses and connections to uptown.

“Do-nothing” is not an option to me. And Bob Prasch, keep that humor rolling in and I hope to see you as a visiting bartender at the Dog House in the near future.

RON KASPRISIN

Langley WA